| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4D0AD232.8020107@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:00:02 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Adam Belay <abelay@....edu> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] PCI: revert to allocating bottom-up, avoid E820 areas On 12/16/2010 01:59 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com> wrote: >> >> So I think the best band-aid for now is to revert to bottom-up allocation >> and do a better job of avoiding E820 reserved areas. Obviously, it's not >> complete because we could still trip over ACPI devices (as in 23802), but >> that's a problem we've always had and it's not as likely if we go bottom-up. > > Ok, ack for this series. Have we got testers for it? In particular, > have the people who have seen regressions been notified of this new > series? > Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> ... for the series as well. For what it's worth. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists