[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D0AD4A8.7050206@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:10:32 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher priority
task can take the lock and reduce unrelated boosting
On 12/17/2010 04:33 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>> Hi, Thomas,
>>
>> Where can I find the code of stress testcases?
>
> See http://rt.wiki.kernel.org, There are several benchmarks available
> for RT there.
>
> I believe there are some built-int rt-mutex testers as well:\
> CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER
>
Thank you very much,
I have tested the testcases in scripts/rt-tester/ with CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER=y
I also try to port it to -rt. Steven, have you ported it to -rt?
Thanks,
Lai.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists