[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101217032721.GD20847@linux-sh.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:27:21 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] radix_tree_destroy?
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:27:41AM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> +static void
> +radix_tree_node_destroy(struct radix_tree_node *node, unsigned int height,
> + void (*slot_free)(void *))
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + if (height == 0)
> + return;
> + for (i = 0; i < RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE; i++) {
> + if (node->slots[i]) {
> + if (height > 1) {
> + radix_tree_node_destroy(node->slots[i],
> + height-1, slot_free);
> + radix_tree_node_free(node->slots[i]);
> + node->slots[i] = NULL;
> + } else
> + slot_free(node->slots[i]);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void radix_tree_destroy(struct radix_tree_root *root, void (*slot_free)(void *))
> +{
> + if (root->rnode == NULL)
> + return;
> + if (root->height == 0)
> + slot_free(root->rnode);
Don't you want indirect_to_ptr(root->rnode) here? You probably also don't
want the callback in the !radix_tree_is_indirect_ptr() case.
> + else {
> + radix_tree_node_destroy(root->rnode, root->height, slot_free);
> + radix_tree_node_free(root->rnode);
> + root->height = 0;
> + }
> + root->rnode = NULL;
> +}
The above will handle the nodes, but what about the root? It looks like
you're at least going to leak tags on the root, so at the very least
you'd still want a root_tag_clear_all() here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists