linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.37] led_class: fix typo in blink API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1292692810.3653.3.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
Date:	Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:20:10 +0100
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.37] led_class: fix typo in blink API

On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 19:42 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
> 
> When I added led_blink_set I had a typo: the
> return value of the hw offload is a regular
> error code that is zero when succesful, and
> in that case software emulation should not
> be used, rather than the other way around.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
> ---
> It'd be nice to get this into 2.6.37 since the patch
> that has the bug is in there. Sorry about that -- I
> had tested the software implementation extensively but
> apparently never tested the hw offload part.

Any chance of this getting in still?

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/