linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce hardware spinlock framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:53:11 -0800
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Hari Kanigeri <h-kanigeri2@...com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce hardware spinlock framework

* Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com> [101216 13:34]:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> >> > I've seen a lot of discussion about this, are all of the review comments
> >> > now addressed?
> >>
> >> Yes, all comments were addressed in this v3 iteration, and this thread
> >> has been idle for about 10 days.
> >
> > That's because we are all busy with other things :(
> 
> Oh sure, my intention was only positive (to demonstrate that there are
> no outstanding comments), sorry if it sounded differently than
> intended.
> 
> > Sorry, I really don't have the time at the moment to review this code,
> > nor does it seem to affect areas that I maintain, so I don't understand
> > what you are looking for from me.
> 
> Sorry for the noise - I contacted you because you maintain the driver
> core, in the hope you could suggest where this can go through.
> 
> Tony, Andrew, can you please have a look ?
> 
> Any comment or suggestion is appreciated.

Looks sane to me from omap point of view and it seems the locks
are now all timeout based:

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/