lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:32:10 +0100 From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de> Cc: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>, "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, "Patil, Kiran" <kiran.patil@...el.com>, Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>, Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@...co.com>, "J.H." <warthog9@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] TCM/LIO v4.0.0-rc6 for 2.6.37-rc6 On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:27 PM, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de> wrote: > [ ... ] > Look, I'm not interested in the backstabbing. *Both* projects have > fairly large user bases and businesses with revenue models built around > them, so I see that argument as a wash for both sides. References please. Since several years there is much more activity on the SCST mailing list than on the LIO mailing list, what makes me wonder about the size of the LIO user base. And regarding revenue models: I'm not sure any of these projects is currently generating enough revenue to even sustain a single person. Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists