linux-kernel - Re: [stable] [ANNOUNCE] Linux 2.6.35.10 has been released

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101219163935.GA23359@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 19 Dec 2010 08:39:35 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Serge Belyshev <belyshev@...ni.sinp.msu.ru>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [ANNOUNCE] Linux 2.6.35.10 has been released

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:36:10AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 04:21:46PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Could you please update this tree:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.35.y.git ?
> > 
> > No, the "stable" trees are not being updated anymore, they have moved to
> > the longterm git directory instead.
> 
> It would be good if the old stable git tree for 2.6.35 was deleted to avoid
> confusion. Greg, what do you think?

No, we have never deleted any of the other trees when we "stopped"
maintaining them, so we shouldn't delete these either.

I need to look this week at using git notes to mark trees as unsupported
or supported in a way that will work well.  That should solve this issue
as the note could also say 'go look at the longterm kernel' as well.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/