[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201012192000.14969.PeterHuewe@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:00:14 +0100
From: Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@....de>
To: sedat.dilek@...il.com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
John Linville <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: Fix recursive Kconfig dependency
Am Freitag 17 Dezember 2010, 12:30:15 schrieb Sedat Dilek:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@....de> wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch 15 Dezember 2010, 21:51:04 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> >> > Hi, another patch was posted before:
> >> >
> >> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.platform.x86.devel/970/ma
> >> > tch =acpi_wmi
> >> >Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> >
> > Yeah, you're right - but as Sedat's patch is perfect (and fixes both) -
> > so for Sedats's patch:
> > Acked-by: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Peter
>
> [ CC John Linville ]
>
> It's a bit disappointing to see my fix is still not in
> platform-drivers-x86/linux-next [1] (even it's only fixing "warnings",
> 9 days past).
> linux-next tree is for me a very high dynamic SCM tree, I am doing
> mostly daily builds, at weekend I am testing/pulling other trees
> before they go into Monday's linux-next.
> As far as I have fun with "my process"... I will continue.
Added Stephen Rothwell on CC, maybe he can apply it directly to linux-next ;)
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists