[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1292842010.11946.39.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:46:50 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC -v2 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function
On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 12:39 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/20/2010 12:33 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > >
> > > Correct. I don't want the other task to run before me, I just don't
> > > want to run before it.
> >
> > OK, so what I gather is that if you can preempt another of your own
> > threads to get the target to cpu, that would be a good thing whether
> > he's on the same cpu as yield_to() caller or not. If the target is
> > sharing a cpu with you, that's even better. Correct?
>
> Correct. I'm not interested in scheduling wrt other tasks, just my tasks.
>
> However, if I'm all alone on my cpu, and the other task is runnable but
> not running, behind some unrelated task, then I do need that task to be
> preempted (or to move tasks around).
So in that case, a pull may be advantageous.
> > Would a kick/hint option be useful?
>
> Depends on what it does...
Let you decide whether you only want to drop a hint and leave it at
that, or also attempt a preemption.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists