lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:48:20 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc:	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
	Mike Anderson <andmike@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...ux.intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ravi Anand <ravi.anand@...gic.com>,
	Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>,
	Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@...co.com>,
	James Smart <james.smart@...lex.com>,
	Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
	adam radford <aradford@...il.com>,
	Kashyap Desai <Kashyap.Desai@....com>,
	MPTFusionLinux <DL-MPTFusionLinux@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] scsi: Add IRQ_DISABLE_SCSI_QCMD wrapper

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 01:21:57PM -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
> 
> This patch adds a IRQ_DISABLE_SCSI_QCMD() wrapper macro used by LLDs
> that can now run in host_lock less mode, but still need interrupts disabled
> using local_irq_save() before calling their lld_queuecommand() dispatcher.
> 
> jgarzik says this method is in fact slower than doing a spin_lock_irqsave() on
> internal lib_lld_queuecommand() callers (as is done in libiscsi and libata)
> but is still needed by the majority of lock_less LLDs.

As mentioned before, please don't add more macro obsfucation - The
initial one Jeff added was ok for the quick transition and avoiding to
have two methods, but any additional one is not helpful.

In addition there's really no reason to every use this one.  There is
not reason to disable local irqs in a driver without taking a spinlock.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists