linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RESEND] scripts: add no-warning option to the checkpatch script

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTimNe7_3Za6YgY69zEuXYCmU4dZdCjfLN2QMM=jb@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:48:33 +0100
From:	Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, apw@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] scripts: add no-warning option to the checkpatch script

2010/12/20 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>:
> On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 09:37 +0100, Marco Stornelli wrote:
>> 2010/12/20 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>:
>> > Why do you think it's useful?
>> To "debug" a patch from style point of view, I think it's useful to
>> fix before the errors and then the warnings. So this option it's
>> useful as a "filter". However, I added you in cc: because of a reply
>> to my first patch that indicated you as a person interested in this
>> scope.
>
> Perhaps then it'd be better to filter/enable/disable
> the 3 current categories of messages.
>
> Maybe something like this:

Yeah, very good. Will it be inserted in mainline?

Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/