lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:19:19 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> To: Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com> Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, efault@....de, pjt@...gle.com, markus@...ppelsdorf.de, tglx@...utronix.de, oleg@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched: Add 'autogroup' scheduling feature: automated per session task groups On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 18:38 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > The autogroup patchset removes the display of cgroup name from > sched_debug output. Hrmph.. that wasn't supposed to happen, care to send a patch to fix that up? > Also, with tg_shares_up improvements, the leaf cfs_rqs are maintained > on rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list only if they carry any load. But the code to > display cfs_rq information for sched_debug isn't updated and hence > information from a few cfs_rqs are missing from sched_debug. Well, that's a _good_ thing, right? I mean, if we know they're empty, and don't contribute to schedule, why bother displaying them? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists