[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101220105322.3b0dba88.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:53:22 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] drop page reference on remove_from_page_cache
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 02:13:36 +0900
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:
> Now we add page reference on add_to_page_cache but doesn't drop it
> in remove_from_page_cache. Such asymmetric makes confusing about
> page reference so that caller should notice it and comment why they
> release page reference. It's not good API.
>
> Long time ago, Hugh tried it[1] but gave up of reason which
> reiser4's drop_page had to unlock the page between removing it from
> page cache and doing the page_cache_release. But now the situation is
> changed. I think at least things in current mainline doesn't have any
> obstacles. The problem is fs or somethings out of mainline.
> If it has done such thing like reiser4, this patch could be a problem.
>
> Do anyone know the such things? Do we care about things out of mainline?
>
> Note :
> The comment of remove_from_page_cache make by copy & paste & s/swap/page/
> from delete_from_swap_cache.
>
> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/24/140
>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
I like this.
Reviewd-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists