[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1292860929.5021.16.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:02:09 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>,
Tim Pepper <lnxninja@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/15] nohz_task: Restart tick when RCU forces nohz
task cpu quiescent state
On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 16:24 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> If a cpu is in nohz mode due to a nohz task running, then
> it is not able to notify quiescent states requested by other
> CPUs.
>
> Then restart the tick to remotely force the quiescent states on the
> nohz task cpus.
-ENOPARSE.. if its in NOHZ state, it couldn't possibly need to
participate in the quiescent state machine because the cpu is in a
quiescent state and has 0 RCU activity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists