[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101220112227.E566.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:21:52 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] truncate: Remove unnecessary page release
> This patch series changes remove_from_page_cache's page ref counting
> rule. page cache ref count is decreased in remove_from_page_cache.
> So we don't need call again in caller context.
>
> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
> Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
> ---
> mm/truncate.c | 1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/truncate.c b/mm/truncate.c
> index 9ee5673..8decb93 100644
> --- a/mm/truncate.c
> +++ b/mm/truncate.c
> @@ -114,7 +114,6 @@ truncate_complete_page(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
> * calls cleancache_put_page (and note page->mapping is now NULL)
> */
> cleancache_flush_page(mapping, page);
> - page_cache_release(page); /* pagecache ref */
> return 0;
Do we _always_ have stable page reference here? IOW, I can assume
cleancache_flush_page() doesn't cause NULL deref?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists