[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101221074727.00900015.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:47:27 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "J.H." <warthog9@...nel.org>
Cc: sedat.dilek@...il.com, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ftpadmin@...nel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 20
Hi John,
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:29:44 -0800 "J.H." <warthog9@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Gingerbread released last week, loads have been spiking to well above
> 300 on the frontend machines, RAM usage has been in the ~20G range (on
> machines with 16G of RAM), and we've been running an *AVERAGE* of 2000+
> simultaneous GIT processes worldwide (normal is in the 100-200 range).
>
> Bonus points that we blew a drive on one of the machines yesterday.
>
> I don't think anyone was quite expecting the onslaught we have gotten
> this time around, and I'm going to have to make some changes before the
> next big release (mainly shifting Android over to the bigger machines)
Thanks for the info. I figured something like that was up. I guess we
all just need to be patient for a while.
> With cyclical patterns of fast and slow syncs. We seem to be (right
> now) in the middle of one of the slow cycles with the last few syncs
> taking a couple of hours each. The culprit, for at least the current
> sync, seems to be the box with the highest load and the blown drive,
> which I'm also reluctant to disable since it's still handling it's fair
> share of the load and dumping all of that onto the opposite US mirror
> would not be good either.
Fair enough.
I normally wait for the sync to happen before I send out the linux-next
release message each day. I will continue to wait for a while, but will
lower my expectations :-)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists