linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the ux500-core tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101220042344.GB10050@linux-sh.org>
Date:	Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:23:44 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sundar Iyer <sundar.iyer@...ricsson.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the ux500-core tree

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 03:21:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> The genirq core is being converted to pass struct irq_data to irq_chip
> operations rather than an IRQ number. Update the tc35892 driver to the
> new APIs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> Acked-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@...ricsson.com>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>

Sorry to hijack the thread..

> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tc3589x.c b/drivers/mfd/tc3589x.c
> index 32291fe..dde2d858 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/tc3589x.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tc3589x.c
> @@ -170,15 +170,15 @@ again:
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> -static void tc3589x_irq_dummy(unsigned int irq)
> +static void tc3589x_irq_dummy(struct irq_data *data)
>  {
>  	/* No mask/unmask at this level */
>  }
>  
>  static struct irq_chip tc3589x_irq_chip = {
> -	.name	= "tc3589x",
> -	.mask	= tc3589x_irq_dummy,
> -	.unmask	= tc3589x_irq_dummy,
> +	.name		= "tc3589x",
> +	.irq_mask	= tc3589x_irq_dummy,
> +	.irq_unmask	= tc3589x_irq_dummy,
>  };
>  
>  static int tc3589x_irq_init(struct tc3589x *tc3589x)

Is there some reason you don't just kill this off and use dummy_irq_chip?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/