[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101220235158.GE1715@nowhere>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:52:03 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>,
Tim Pepper <lnxninja@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/15] nohz_task: Restart tick when RCU forces nohz
task cpu quiescent state
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 05:02:09PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 16:24 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > If a cpu is in nohz mode due to a nohz task running, then
> > it is not able to notify quiescent states requested by other
> > CPUs.
> >
> > Then restart the tick to remotely force the quiescent states on the
> > nohz task cpus.
>
> -ENOPARSE.. if its in NOHZ state, it couldn't possibly need to
> participate in the quiescent state machine because the cpu is in a
> quiescent state and has 0 RCU activity.
But it can be in nohz state in the kernel in which case it can have
any RCU activity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists