lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:37:27 +0100 From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, apw@...onical.com Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] scripts: add no-warning option to the checkpatch script 2010/12/20 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>: > On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 10:28 +0100, Marco Stornelli wrote: >> From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com> >> Add no-warning option to the checkpatch script. >> Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com> > > Hello Marco. > > I don't have much of an opinion on this. > I don't actually use checkpatch much. > Why do you think it's useful? To "debug" a patch from style point of view, I think it's useful to fix before the errors and then the warnings. So this option it's useful as a "filter". However, I added you in cc: because of a reply to my first patch that indicated you as a person interested in this scope. Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists