linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RESEND] scripts: add no-warning option to the checkpatch script

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTi=WP9k_yqyvvJmy2ZW0ErO9Yt=jQjVvWQ_RGByv@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:37:27 +0100
From:	Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, apw@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] scripts: add no-warning option to the checkpatch script

2010/12/20 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>:
> On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 10:28 +0100, Marco Stornelli wrote:
>> From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
>> Add no-warning option to the checkpatch script.
>> Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
>
> Hello Marco.
>
> I don't have much of an opinion on this.
> I don't actually use checkpatch much.
> Why do you think it's useful?

To "debug" a patch from style point of view, I think it's useful to
fix before the errors and then the warnings. So this option it's
useful as a "filter". However, I added you in cc: because of a reply
to my first patch that indicated you as a person interested in this
scope.

Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/