[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D107979.2020405@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:55:05 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4 V2 ] futex,plist: pass the real head of the priority list
to plist_del()
Some plist_del()s in kernel/futex.c are passed a faked head of the
priority list.
It can work because current code does not require the real head
in plist_del(). The code of plist_del() just uses the head for checking,
so it will not cause bad result even when we use a faked head.
But it is an undocumented usage:
/**
* plist_del - Remove a @node from plist.
*
* @node: &struct plist_node pointer - entry to be removed
* @head: &struct plist_head pointer - list head
*/
The document said that @head is "list head" the head of the priority list.
In futex code, several places use "plist_del(&q->list, &q->list.plist);",
they passes faked head, we fix them all.
Thank to Darren Hart for many suggests.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 3019b92..d901f40 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -740,6 +740,23 @@ retry:
return ret;
}
+/**
+ * __unqueue_futex() - Remove the futex_q from its futex_hash_bucket
+ * @q: The futex_q to unqueue
+ *
+ * The q->lock_ptr must not be NULL and must be held by the caller.
+ */
+static void __unqueue_futex(struct futex_q *q)
+{
+ struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!q->lock_ptr || !spin_is_locked(q->lock_ptr)))
+ return;
+
+ hb = container_of(q->lock_ptr, struct futex_hash_bucket, lock);
+ plist_del(&q->list, &hb->chain);
+}
+
/*
* The hash bucket lock must be held when this is called.
* Afterwards, the futex_q must not be accessed.
@@ -757,7 +774,7 @@ static void wake_futex(struct futex_q *q)
*/
get_task_struct(p);
- plist_del(&q->list, &q->list.plist);
+ __unqueue_futex(q);
/*
* The waiting task can free the futex_q as soon as
* q->lock_ptr = NULL is written, without taking any locks. A
@@ -1067,7 +1084,7 @@ void requeue_pi_wake_futex(struct futex_q *q, union futex_key *key,
q->key = *key;
WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&q->list));
- plist_del(&q->list, &q->list.plist);
+ __unqueue_futex(q);
WARN_ON(!q->rt_waiter);
q->rt_waiter = NULL;
@@ -1471,7 +1488,7 @@ retry:
goto retry;
}
WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&q->list));
- plist_del(&q->list, &q->list.plist);
+ __unqueue_futex(q);
BUG_ON(q->pi_state);
@@ -1492,7 +1509,7 @@ static void unqueue_me_pi(struct futex_q *q)
__releases(q->lock_ptr)
{
WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&q->list));
- plist_del(&q->list, &q->list.plist);
+ __unqueue_futex(q);
BUG_ON(!q->pi_state);
free_pi_state(q->pi_state);
@@ -2133,7 +2150,7 @@ int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
* We were woken prior to requeue by a timeout or a signal.
* Unqueue the futex_q and determine which it was.
*/
- plist_del(&q->list, &q->list.plist);
+ plist_del(&q->list, &hb->chain);
/* Handle spurious wakeups gracefully */
ret = -EWOULDBLOCK;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists