linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Use this_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101221112252.GB3515@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:22:54 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Use this_cpu_ops to optimize code

Hello,

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 05:33:52PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 12/18/2010 07:28 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Peter, these three patches are the x86 ones which were in
> > percpu#for-next but should go through x86 tree.  These should be
> > applied on top of percpu#this_cpu_ops.
> 
> Does that mean the latter is now a stable base that I can pull into -tip?

Yes, #for-next may be rebased but both #this_cpu_ops and #for-2.6.38
are stable branches.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/