[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1292936312.3296.8.camel@odin>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:58:32 +0000
From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: max8952 - fix max8952_set_voltage check
condition.
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 14:04 +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> In the current implementation, the GPIO pin, vid0 is checked twice
> (duplicated!) while vid1 is never checked; however, both vid0 and
> vid1 should be checked. This patch fixes the typo that stated vid0 where
> should've stated vid1.
>
> Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/max8952.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/max8952.c b/drivers/regulator/max8952.c
> index 0d5dda4..c7dae2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/max8952.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/max8952.c
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static int max8952_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> s8 vid = -1, i;
>
> if (!gpio_is_valid(max8952->pdata->gpio_vid0) ||
> - !gpio_is_valid(max8952->pdata->gpio_vid0)) {
> + !gpio_is_valid(max8952->pdata->gpio_vid1)) {
> /* DVS not supported */
> return -EPERM;
> }
Does this series depend on your MFD MAX8998/LP3974 hibernation, charger
patch ?
Thanks
Liam
--
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists