linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][resend][SCSI] Reduce number of sequential pointer derefs in scsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1292953070.3034.12.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date:	Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:37:50 -0600
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
To:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Youngdale <eric@...ante.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Mike Anderson <andmike@...ibm.com>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][resend][SCSI] Reduce number of sequential pointer
 derefs in scsi_error.c and reduce size as well

On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 19:48 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok, I tried doing that (see patch below)
> > 
> > Actually, you kind of chose exactly the reverse of the functions I'd
> > have chosen.
> > 
> > Try doing the added parameter to the small static helper functions.
> > Those are the ones that tend to get inlined, and then the parameter
> > should actually result in _fewer_ pointer reloads.
> > 
> > So the ones like this:
> > 
> > >  static int __scsi_try_to_abort_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> [...]
> 
> I see your point now.
> 
> I tried this with most of the functions where it seemed that it could 
> possibly be a gain, but in the end it turned out that only the one you 
> pointed out above actually saw any benefit, so that's the only one I 
> changed.
> 
> In the end, the object size is down to this:
> 
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>   18713     128    4704   23545    5bf9 drivers/scsi/scsi_error.o
> 
> from this:
> 
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>   18790     128    4712   23630    5c4e drivers/scsi/scsi_error.o
> 
> 
> and the patch looks like this now:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>

This is rejecting against scsi-misc:

patching file drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
Hunk #9 FAILED at 610.
Hunk #10 FAILED at 647.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 850 (offset -22 lines).
Hunk #12 succeeded at 970 (offset -22 lines).
Hunk #13 succeeded at 1013 (offset -22 lines).
Hunk #14 succeeded at 1067 (offset -22 lines).
Hunk #15 succeeded at 1167 (offset -33 lines).
Hunk #16 succeeded at 1184 (offset -33 lines).
Hunk #17 succeeded at 1226 (offset -33 lines).
Hunk #18 succeeded at 1379 (offset -33 lines).
Hunk #19 succeeded at 1976 (offset -33 lines).
2 out of 19 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c.rej

It looks like changes caused by 

    commit 459dbf72e4d2b4aa13620e6b70d54f098547bf13
    [SCSI] Eliminate error handler overload of the SCSI serial number

Could you respin so it applies, please?

Thanks,

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/