[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1292956832.2170.17.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 19:40:32 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Akihiro Nagai <akihiro.nagai.hw@...achi.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v2 2/6] perf bts: Introduce new sub command 'perf
bts trace'
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 19:31 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Actually the best would be to select PERF_SAMPLE_ID in the sample_type
> on record and also PERF_FORMAT_ID in the read_format.
That would grow the data size for little gain, as long as you only
record BTS data into the buffer the current bits should work fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists