[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikHV-qN73Zvvvxn76vtFFKG_VNTQhF3qpqTnOrE@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:13:06 +0900
From: "Kuwahara,T." <6vvetjsrt26xsrzlh1z0zn4d2grdah@...il.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...ux.it>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/8] ntp: add ADJ_SETOFFSET mode bit
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:37 AM, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> wrote:
> adjtimex is a linux specific interface, which is compatible but not
> identical to the ntp specified interfaces. The ntp client code already
> has Linux specific modifications, so I don't think we have to worry
> about 0x40 specifically being reserved by the NTP client.
But struct timex is not linux-specific...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists