[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101221021523.GA2605@nowhere>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:15:26 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>,
Tim Pepper <lnxninja@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] Nohz task support
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 08:36:39PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 00:33 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >
> > > I wounder if we could just have this happen automatically.
> >
> > But this would add some global overhead, especially in the syscall
> > path as we need to take the slow path to hook userspace resume/exit.
> >
>
> I guess we could measure the overhead. See if the timer causes more
> overhead than the added overhead of the syscall, or not.
Indeed, but may be let's stage that first as a conditional attribute
and if it proves better results most of the time, then let's make it
the default.
Hm?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists