[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101221044050.GA25718@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:40:50 +0800
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
Andy Walls <awalls@...metrocast.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nicolas.mailhot@...oste.net,
Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [V2 PATCH] kthread_work: Make lockdep happy
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Subject: [V2 PATCH] kthread_work: Make lockdep happy
spinlock in kthread_worker and wait_queue_head in kthread_work
both should be lockdep sensible.
So change the interface to make it suiltable for CONFIG_LOCKDEP.
Reported-by: Nicolas <nicolas.mailhot@...oste.net>
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Walls <awalls@...metrocast.net>
---
Changes from V1:
*According to Tejun, kthread_worker could be defined on stack,
So introduce DEFINE_KTHREAD_WORKER_ONSTACK.
*Change wrong setting to kthread_work->task. Thanks Adny for
pointing it.
*including some minor issue.
BTW, only passed build.
include/linux/kthread.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
kernel/kthread.c | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kthread.h b/include/linux/kthread.h
index 685ea65..f8b3320 100644
--- a/include/linux/kthread.h
+++ b/include/linux/kthread.h
@@ -81,16 +81,41 @@ struct kthread_work {
#define DEFINE_KTHREAD_WORK(work, fn) \
struct kthread_work work = KTHREAD_WORK_INIT(work, fn)
-static inline void init_kthread_worker(struct kthread_worker *worker)
-{
- *worker = (struct kthread_worker)KTHREAD_WORKER_INIT(*worker);
-}
-
-static inline void init_kthread_work(struct kthread_work *work,
- kthread_work_func_t fn)
-{
- *work = (struct kthread_work)KTHREAD_WORK_INIT(*work, fn);
-}
+/*
+ * kthread_worker.lock and kthread_work.done need
+ * special work if they are defined on stack with
+ * lockdep enabled.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+# define KTHREAD_WORKER_INIT_ONSTACK(worker) \
+ ({ init_kthread_worker(&worker); worker; })
+# define DEFINE_KTHREAD_WORKER_ONSTACK(worker) \
+ struct kthread_worker worker = KTHREAD_WORKER_INIT_ONSTACK(worker)
+# define KTHREAD_WORK_INIT_ONSTACK(work, fn) \
+ ({ init_kthread_work((&work), fn); work; })
+# define DEFINE_KTHREAD_WORK_ONSTACK(work, fn) \
+ struct kthread_work work = KTHREAD_WORK_INIT_ONSTACK(work, fn)
+#else
+# define DEFINE_KTHREAD_WORKER_ONSTACK(worker) DEFINE_KTHREAD_WORKER(worker)
+# define DEFINE_KTHREAD_WORK_ONSTACK(work, fn) DEFINE_KTHREAD_WORK(work, fn)
+#endif
+
+extern void __init_kthread_worker(struct kthread_worker *worker,
+ struct lock_class_key *key);
+
+#define init_kthread_worker(worker) \
+ do { \
+ static struct lock_class_key __key; \
+ __init_kthread_worker((worker), &__key); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define init_kthread_work(work, fn) \
+ do { \
+ memset((work), 0, sizeof(struct kthread_work)); \
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(work)->node); \
+ (work)->func = (fn); \
+ init_waitqueue_head(&(work)->done); \
+ } while (0)
int kthread_worker_fn(void *worker_ptr);
diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
index 2dc3786..f760587 100644
--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -265,6 +265,15 @@ int kthreadd(void *unused)
return 0;
}
+void __init_kthread_worker(struct kthread_worker *worker,
+ struct lock_class_key *key)
+{
+ spin_lock_init(&worker->lock);
+ lockdep_set_class(&worker->lock, key);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->work_list);
+ worker->task = NULL;
+}
+
/**
* kthread_worker_fn - kthread function to process kthread_worker
* @worker_ptr: pointer to initialized kthread_worker
--
1.7.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists