[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1293008656.2170.67.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:04:16 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] perf: Add load latency monitoring on Intel
Nehalem/Westmere
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 09:33 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 16:12 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> > It's applied on top of tip/master(3ea1f4f89) and Andi's offcore
> > patchsets are needed.
>
> I still haven't gotten a version of that I'm willing to apply.
That is, maybe you could pick up his patches and finish them, Andi
doesn't seem interested in getting them sorted.
I think the last posting lost the needs_percore logic, which would avoid
the percore allocations on platforms that don't need it (if we can
detect if HT is enabled that would be nice too).
I think he also lost the topology iteration (which can be used for both
the percore and the amd northbridge stuff), currently we iterate the
full machine looking for a matching nb/core_id, using a smaller topology
mask makes sense.
Also, after reading your patch, I think we want the MSR names in the
lists, not the numbers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists