linux-kernel - Re: Early kernel messages are overflowing the static log buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101222131719.GA8061@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:17:19 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
	Lori Gilbertson <loriann@....com>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Early kernel messages are overflowing the static log buffer

Hello,

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 02:09:46PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > [    0.000000] pcpu-alloc: [000] 0000 0001 0002 0003 0004 0005 0006 0007 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031
> > 
> > What I'm asking is which of these would be most acceptable to
> > either remove or replace with some sort of message reduction?
> 
> The pcpu alloc messages look entirely superfluous and zappable - make them 
> KERN_DEBUG perhaps (and Cc: Tejun)?

Yeap, with percpu allocator now mostly stable, I don't think the
message needs to be KERN_INFO anymore.  I'll change it to KERN_DEBUG.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/