lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101222145917.GB1760@dumpdata.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:59:17 -0500
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] xen/p2m: change p2m_missing_* to p2m_identity_*

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 02:41:23PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 12/21/2010 01:37 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
> >
> > We are going to alter how we think about P2M. Most of the
> > P2M contains MFN, and areas that are not populated are
> > considered to be "missing". Missing means that the PFN
> > is either not set for this guest (not have that much memory
> > allocated) or is under the balloon driver ownership.
> >
> > We are instead now going to think of those not populated
> > areas as "identity." Meaning that that the PFN for which
> > we would get the p2m_identity we will provide the the PFN
> > value back instead of P2M_MISSING. Essentially treating
> > those regions as PFN==MFN.
> >
> 
> This renames missing -> identity, but does it actually change the
> functionality?  Doesn't it just leave it being misnamed?  It would
> probably be better to fold in the actual identity implementation as well.

You sure? It would be a lot of changes in one patch. This patch is
a nop - so no functional changes except the name change.

Let me annotate the git tree to mention this.

> >  		mid_mfn_mfn = virt_to_mfn(mid_mfn);
> > -		if (cmpxchg(top_mfn_p, missing_mfn, mid_mfn_mfn) != missing_mfn)
> > +		if (cmpxchg(top_mfn_p, identity_mfn, mid_mfn_mfn) !=
> > +		    identity_mfn)
> 
> Don't wrap this.

Checkpatch.pl was unhappy without it. I can ignore this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ