linux-kernel - Re: RFC: short reads on block devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1mxnxznm2.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date:	Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:08:53 -0500
From:	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
Cc:	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, dgilbert@...erlog.com,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Penokie\, George" <George.Penokie@....com>
Subject: Re: RFC: short reads on block devices

>>>>> "James" == James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de> writes:

James> Well, T10 always gives the most conservative approach.  All other
James> array (and certainly all disk) vendors seem to confirm valid data
James> up to the error ... certainly for the DIF case, Martin secured
James> this agreement.

Well, secured is probably too strong a word. Nobody objected when it was
put in the DIX spec...

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/