[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201012222208.59577.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:08:59 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 2/2] i2c: Factor out runtime suspend checks from PM operations
On Wednesday, December 22, 2010, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 08:40:23PM +0530, Rabin Vincent wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't you be deleting the pm_runtime_* stuff from here? There is
> > already done in pm_generic_restore() iff the callback exists and returns
> > zero.
>
> I guess; it's not clear why this is being done by the bus at all or how
> it interacts with the legacy stuff.
It is done, because when the driver's ->resume() or ->restore() brings the
device up (which should have happened if it returned 0), we need to mark
the device as "active" for runtime PM.
Since __pm_generic_resume() does that, it's not necessary to do it in the
bus type callbacks (in the "legacy" case we known that runtime PM is not
supported).
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists