[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101222071319.GB8627@riccoc20.at.omicron.at>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:13:19 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc: "Kuwahara,T." <6vvetjsrt26xsrzlh1z0zn4d2grdah@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...ux.it>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/8] ntp: add ADJ_SETOFFSET mode bit
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 02:25:55PM -0800, john stultz wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 05:57 +0900, Kuwahara,T. wrote:
>
> > How about this?
> >
> > if (txc->modes & ADJ_OFFSET) {
> > if (txc->constant == INT32_MIN) {
> > /* step time */
> > } else {
> > /* slew time */
> > }
> > }
>
> This looks like magic behavior. Sort of a "knock twice and then say the
> password" interface. I don't see why that would be better then adding a
> clear new mode flag?
I have to agree with John on this one. Looks very hacky to me.
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists