[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D130383.30406@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:08:35 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] KVM: MMU: audit: allow audit more guests at the
same time
It only allows to audit one guest in the system since:
- 'audit_point' is a glob variable
- mmu_audit_disable() is called in kvm_mmu_destroy(), so audit is disabled
after a guest exited
this patch fix those issues then allow to audit more guests at the same time
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4461429..c447f50 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -460,6 +460,10 @@ struct kvm_arch {
/* fields used by HYPER-V emulation */
u64 hv_guest_os_id;
u64 hv_hypercall;
+
+ #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_MMU_AUDIT
+ int audit_point;
+ #endif
};
struct kvm_vm_stat {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index c3853d5..4e49e24 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -3528,13 +3528,6 @@ static void mmu_destroy_caches(void)
kmem_cache_destroy(mmu_page_header_cache);
}
-void kvm_mmu_module_exit(void)
-{
- mmu_destroy_caches();
- percpu_counter_destroy(&kvm_total_used_mmu_pages);
- unregister_shrinker(&mmu_shrinker);
-}
-
int kvm_mmu_module_init(void)
{
pte_chain_cache = kmem_cache_create("kvm_pte_chain",
@@ -3727,12 +3720,6 @@ int kvm_mmu_get_spte_hierarchy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 sptes[4])
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmu_get_spte_hierarchy);
-#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_MMU_AUDIT
-#include "mmu_audit.c"
-#else
-static void mmu_audit_disable(void) { }
-#endif
-
void kvm_mmu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
ASSERT(vcpu);
@@ -3740,5 +3727,18 @@ void kvm_mmu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
destroy_kvm_mmu(vcpu);
free_mmu_pages(vcpu);
mmu_free_memory_caches(vcpu);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_MMU_AUDIT
+#include "mmu_audit.c"
+#else
+static void mmu_audit_disable(void) { }
+#endif
+
+void kvm_mmu_module_exit(void)
+{
+ mmu_destroy_caches();
+ percpu_counter_destroy(&kvm_total_used_mmu_pages);
+ unregister_shrinker(&mmu_shrinker);
mmu_audit_disable();
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c
index ba2bcdd..5f6223b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c
@@ -19,11 +19,9 @@
#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
-static int audit_point;
-
-#define audit_printk(fmt, args...) \
+#define audit_printk(kvm, fmt, args...) \
printk(KERN_ERR "audit: (%s) error: " \
- fmt, audit_point_name[audit_point], ##args)
+ fmt, audit_point_name[kvm->arch.audit_point], ##args)
typedef void (*inspect_spte_fn) (struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level);
@@ -97,18 +95,21 @@ static void audit_mappings(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level)
if (sp->unsync) {
if (level != PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL) {
- audit_printk("unsync sp: %p level = %d\n", sp, level);
+ audit_printk(vcpu->kvm, "unsync sp: %p "
+ "level = %d\n", sp, level);
return;
}
if (*sptep == shadow_notrap_nonpresent_pte) {
- audit_printk("notrap spte in unsync sp: %p\n", sp);
+ audit_printk(vcpu->kvm, "notrap spte in unsync "
+ "sp: %p\n", sp);
return;
}
}
if (sp->role.direct && *sptep == shadow_notrap_nonpresent_pte) {
- audit_printk("notrap spte in direct sp: %p\n", sp);
+ audit_printk(vcpu->kvm, "notrap spte in direct sp: %p\n",
+ sp);
return;
}
@@ -125,8 +126,9 @@ static void audit_mappings(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level)
hpa = pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
if ((*sptep & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK) != hpa)
- audit_printk("levels %d pfn %llx hpa %llx ent %llxn",
- vcpu->arch.mmu.root_level, pfn, hpa, *sptep);
+ audit_printk(vcpu->kvm, "levels %d pfn %llx hpa %llx "
+ "ent %llxn", vcpu->arch.mmu.root_level, pfn,
+ hpa, *sptep);
}
static void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
@@ -142,8 +144,8 @@ static void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
if (!gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn)) {
if (!printk_ratelimit())
return;
- audit_printk("no memslot for gfn %llx\n", gfn);
- audit_printk("index %ld of sp (gfn=%llx)\n",
+ audit_printk(kvm, "no memslot for gfn %llx\n", gfn);
+ audit_printk(kvm, "index %ld of sp (gfn=%llx)\n",
(long int)(sptep - rev_sp->spt), rev_sp->gfn);
dump_stack();
return;
@@ -153,7 +155,8 @@ static void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
if (!*rmapp) {
if (!printk_ratelimit())
return;
- audit_printk("no rmap for writable spte %llx\n", *sptep);
+ audit_printk(kvm, "no rmap for writable spte %llx\n",
+ *sptep);
dump_stack();
}
}
@@ -168,8 +171,9 @@ static void audit_spte_after_sync(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = page_header(__pa(sptep));
- if (audit_point == AUDIT_POST_SYNC && sp->unsync)
- audit_printk("meet unsync sp(%p) after sync root.\n", sp);
+ if (vcpu->kvm->arch.audit_point == AUDIT_POST_SYNC && sp->unsync)
+ audit_printk(vcpu->kvm, "meet unsync sp(%p) after sync "
+ "root.\n", sp);
}
static void check_mappings_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
@@ -202,8 +206,9 @@ static void audit_write_protection(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, NULL);
while (spte) {
if (is_writable_pte(*spte))
- audit_printk("shadow page has writable mappings: gfn "
- "%llx role %x\n", sp->gfn, sp->role.word);
+ audit_printk(kvm, "shadow page has writable "
+ "mappings: gfn %llx role %x\n",
+ sp->gfn, sp->role.word);
spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, spte);
}
}
@@ -238,7 +243,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_audit(void *ignore, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int point)
if (!__ratelimit(&ratelimit_state))
return;
- audit_point = point;
+ vcpu->kvm->arch.audit_point = point;
audit_all_active_sps(vcpu->kvm);
audit_vcpu_spte(vcpu);
}
--
1.7.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists