[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101223100642.GD3636@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:06:42 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
Johan MOSSBERG <johan.xx.mossberg@...ricsson.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Ankita Garg <ankita@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 00/12] Contiguous Memory Allocator
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 06:30:57PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> any comments? what's the next step to merge it for 2.6.38 kernel. we
> want to use this feature at mainline kernel.
Has anyone addressed my issue with it that this is wide-open for
abuse by allocating large chunks of memory, and then remapping
them in some way with different attributes, thereby violating the
ARM architecture specification?
In other words, do we _actually_ have a use for this which doesn't
involve doing something like allocating 32MB of memory from it,
remapping it so that it's DMA coherent, and then performing DMA
on the resulting buffer?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists