[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=LJB1zA-Kt8KE_qaSNga9iJqnR=FMDRq38Zq5_@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:31:11 +0100
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, paulus <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] perf: Add load latency monitoring on Intel Nehalem/Westmere
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:59 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
>> > {L1, L2, L3, RAM}x{snoop, local, remote}x{shared, exclusive} + {unknown,
>> > uncached, IO}
>> >
>> > Which takes all of 5 bits to encode.
>>
>> Do you mean below encoding?
>>
>> bits4 3 2 1 0
>> + + + + +
>> | | | | |
>> | | | {L1, L2, L3, RAM} or {unknown, uncached, IO}
>> | | |
>> | {snoop, local, remote, OTHER}
>> |
>> {shared, exclusive}
>>
>> If bits(2-3) is OTHER, then bits(0-1) is the encoding of {unknown,
>> uncached, IO}.
>
> That is most certainly a very valid encoding, and a rather nice one at
> that. I hadn't really gone further than: 4*3*2 + 3 < 2^5 :-)
>
> If you also make OTHER=0, then a valid encoding for unknown is also 0,
> which is a nice meaning for 0...
>
I am not sure how you would cover the 9 possibilities for data source as
shown in Table 10-13 using this encoding. Could you show me?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists