lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101222165406.6e3f8fb0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:54:06 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Dean Nelson <dnelson@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] mm, Make __get_user_pages return -EHWPOISON for
 HWPOISON page optionally

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:39:59 +0800
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:

> > > --- a/mm/memory.c
> > > +++ b/mm/memory.c
> > > @@ -1449,9 +1449,16 @@ int __get_user_pages(struct task_struct
> > >  				if (ret & VM_FAULT_ERROR) {
> > >  					if (ret & VM_FAULT_OOM)
> > >  						return i ? i : -ENOMEM;
> > > -					if (ret &
> > > -					    (VM_FAULT_HWPOISON|VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE|
> > > -					     VM_FAULT_SIGBUS))
> > > +					if (ret & (VM_FAULT_HWPOISON |
> > > +						   VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE)) {
> > > +						if (i)
> > > +							return i;
> > > +						else if (gup_flags & FOLL_HWPOISON)
> > > +							return -EHWPOISON;
> > > +						else
> > > +							return -EFAULT;
> > > +					}
> > > +					if (ret & VM_FAULT_SIGBUS)
> > 
> > hm, that function is getting a bit unweildy.
> 
> Yes. Do you think the following code is better?
> 
> return i ? i : (gup_flags & FOLL_HWPOISON) ? -EHWPOISON : -EFAULT;

nope ;)

The function just needs to be ripped up and redone somehow.  That's not
an appropriate activity in the context of this patch though.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ