[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k4j0ehdl.fsf@erwin.mina86.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:41:26 +0100
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
Johan MOSSBERG <johan.xx.mossberg@...ricsson.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Ankita Garg <ankita@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 00/12] Contiguous Memory Allocator
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> writes:
> Has anyone addressed my issue with it that this is wide-open for
> abuse by allocating large chunks of memory, and then remapping
> them in some way with different attributes, thereby violating the
> ARM architecture specification?
>
> In other words, do we _actually_ have a use for this which doesn't
> involve doing something like allocating 32MB of memory from it,
> remapping it so that it's DMA coherent, and then performing DMA
> on the resulting buffer?
Huge pages.
Also, don't treat it as coherent memory and just flush/clear/invalidate
cache before and after each DMA transaction. I never understood what's
wrong with that approach.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenly Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +--<mina86-tlen.pl>--<jid:mina86-jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists