linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] MMC fixes for 2.6.37

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:13:11 +0000
From:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
To:	Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] MMC fixes for 2.6.37

Hi Kyungmin,

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 06:17:50PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> Can you include the s5pc210 external clock support?

As I said:

If Ben agrees, I'm happy to send it on.

If Ben stays silent, then I have to overrule him -- he's the maintainer
of this driver.  I'm okay with doing that, but I'd like to do it by
shipping these patches in the next merge window and giving him (and
others who test the -rc series) time to disagree.

> without this, s5pc210 boards doesn't use the SDHCI.

But that's not a regression from earlier kernels (correct me if I'm
wrong).  Adding support for a new board is a merge window task, not
a final-fixes-before-release task.

I'm sorry these patches have been waiting so long.  I didn't realize
Ben would stay silent on them -- in future, I'll shorten my timeout
for an ACK from Ben.

Thanks,

-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@...top.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/