[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101222212804.a164f488.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:28:04 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: shaohui.zheng@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, gregkh@...e.de,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [5/7, v9] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Support cpu probe/release in
x86_64
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:24:28 +0800 Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Why *does* it check `count' and then not use it?
> >
>
> it is a tricky thing. When I debug it under a Virtual Machine, If I do a cpu
> probe via sysfs cpu/probe interface, The function arch_cpu_probe will be called
> __three__ times, but only one call is valid, so I add a check on `count` to
> ignore the invalid calls.
hm, why does it get called three times? Is that something which
can/should be fixed in callers rather than in the callee?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists