[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1012241933390.28973@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:37:11 +0100 (CET)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] reiserfs: Make sure va_end() is always called after
va_start().
Greetings,
A call to va_start() must always be followed by a call to va_end() in the
same function. In fs/reiserfs/prints.c::print_block() this is not always
the case. If 'bh' is NULL we'll return without calling va_end().
One could add a call to va_end() before the 'return' statement, but it's
nicer to just move the call to va_start() after the test for 'bh' being
NULL.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
---
prints.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/prints.c b/fs/reiserfs/prints.c
index adbc6f5..45de98b 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/prints.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/prints.c
@@ -586,13 +586,13 @@ void print_block(struct buffer_head *bh, ...) //int print_mode, int first, int l
va_list args;
int mode, first, last;
- va_start(args, bh);
-
if (!bh) {
printk("print_block: buffer is NULL\n");
return;
}
+ va_start(args, bh);
+
mode = va_arg(args, int);
first = va_arg(args, int);
last = va_arg(args, int);
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists