[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1012252234340.10759@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 22:35:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
cc: ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ceph: Fix a use-after-free bug in
ceph_destroy_client().
On Sat, 25 Dec 2010, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Dec 2010, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > In net/ceph/ceph_common.c::ceph_destroy_client() the pointer 'client' is
> >> > freed by kfree() and subsequently used in a call to dout() - use after
> >> > free bug.
> >>
> >> Not really. %p reads only the address of "client".
> >> kfree() does not alter this address.
> >>
> >
> > Ok, I see your point and you are correct. But still, the patch does not
> > change behaviour and it makes it absolutely clear that there's no
> > use-after-free bug, so it might still have merit... or?
>
> Your patch does not fix a bug.
> I would say it's a style fix.
>
At this point in time I'd agree. :-)
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists