linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for December 27 (drivers/target)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101227115755.ffcdfc4f.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:57:55 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, nab@...nel.org,
	scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 27 (drivers/target)

On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:04:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> [The mirroring on kernel.org is running slowly]
> 
> Changes since 20101221:
> 
> Linus' tree lost its build failure.


Hi Nick,

Please test building target code when CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled.

When CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled, drivers/target/ gets a boat load of build errors.

Should TCM_IBLOCK depend on BLOCK?  That fixes lots of the build errors,
but not all of them.


The header file include/target/target_core_base.h uses struct queue_limits,
so it should #include <linux/blkdev.h>.


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
desserts:  http://www.xenotime.net/linux/recipes/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/