[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1293493244-17583-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:40:41 -0800
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@...cron.at>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Cleanup ADJ_SETOFFSET patch
I was looking to queue Richard's ADJ_SETOFFSET patch to see
if it could be merged into -tip for 2.6.38, but on second
glance I noticed the ugly local_irq_disable bits as well
as the fact that adding the offset uses a gettime/add/settime
pattern which will also add a small error as the action isn't
atomic.
So I implemented a timekeeping function to add a fixed offset:
timekeeping_inject_offset(), and reworked Richard's code to
make use of it.
Richard: Any objection here? Mind testing this with the rest
of your patch queue?
Thomas: Any comments? Does this seem reasonable for 2.6.38?
Should I fold my cleanups into Richard's patch?
thanks
-john
CC: Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@...cron.at>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
John Stultz (2):
time: Introduce timekeeping_inject_offset
ntp: Change ADJ_SETOFFSET implementation to use
timekeeping_inject_offset
Richard Cochran (1):
ntp: add ADJ_SETOFFSET mode bit
include/linux/time.h | 1 +
include/linux/timex.h | 3 ++-
kernel/time/ntp.c | 13 +++++++++++++
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
--
1.7.3.2.146.gca209
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists