[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101228161657.GF2239@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:16:57 +0200
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] mfd: twl6030-irq: move to threaded_irq
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 03:46:17PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 03:59:49PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
>> + disable_irq_nosync(irq);
>
>You shouldn't need this any more; the driver used to be faffing around
>with this because it wasn't using genirq for this in the past.
>
>> + for (i = 0; sts.int_sts; sts.int_sts >>= 1, i++) {
>> + local_irq_disable();
>
>Simiarly here as far as I know; the original code predates genirq
>support for this so is doing some hairy stuff that is no longer
>required and may actually be harmful.
Aa, true. Forgot that one.
>What I'd expect to see from a conversion like this would be that most of
>the locking/IRQ management stuff would be dropped and the bus_lock() and
>bus_sync_unlock() operations would be implemented.
I'll look into it, thanks.
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists