[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101228174138.GA3089@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:41:39 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] TWL4030 IRQ Changes
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 07:36:04PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> when we finally move to struct irq_data, the below could
> be used. BTW, Thomas do you have any plans for exposing
> irq_data_to_desc() ?
The general idea is to move to struct irq_data sooner rather than later
(all the existing MFD drivers have already been converted).
> -static void twl4030_sih_mask(unsigned irq)
> +/* REVISIT define it here until IRQ Subsystem exports its implementation */
> +#define irq_data_to_desc(data) container_of(data, struct irq_desc, irq_data)
It looks like all you're using this for is to get the chip_data? If
that is the case you're looking for irq_data_get_irq_chip_data() which
will go directly from the irq_data to the chip_data. I may have missed
something, I only scanned the code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists