linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for December 28 (drivers/target/)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:04:15 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
CC:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Joel Becker <joel.becker@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 28 (drivers/target/)

On 12/28/10 11:38, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 08:50 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:39:14 -0600 James Bottomley wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 08:29 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:30:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> [The mirroring on kernel.org is running slowly]
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since 20101227:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> warning: (TARGET_CORE && GFS2_FS) selects CONFIGFS_FS which has unmet direct dependencies (SYSFS)
>>>>
>>>> from:
>>>>
>>>> menuconfig TARGET_CORE
>>>> 	tristate "Generic Target Core Mod (TCM) and ConfigFS Infrastructure"
>>>> 	select CONFIGFS_FS
>>>>
>>>> but CONFIGFS_FS depends on SYSFS, so TARGET_CORE should either depend on SYSFS
>>>> or (eek) it should select SYSFS.
>>>
>>> The latter, I think (and actually, configfs should select sysfs).  All
>>> these unmet dependencies are a minefield.
>>
>> It's just another language to deal with.  Not a big deal, except for the
>> twists that EXPERIMENTAL injects into it.
> 
> I agree with James on this one..  Attached is a patch to select SYSFS
> and fix up some extra whitespace breakage. (jlbec CC'ed)

and I am not surprised.  James is a more liberal 'select'or than I am.

> Thanks,
> 
> --nab
> 
> diff --git a/fs/configfs/Kconfig b/fs/configfs/Kconfig
> index 13587cc..6874d75 100644
> --- a/fs/configfs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/configfs/Kconfig
> @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
>  config CONFIGFS_FS
>  	tristate "Userspace-driven configuration filesystem"
> -	depends on SYSFS
> +	select SYSFS
>  	help
> -	  configfs is a ram-based filesystem that provides the converse
> -	  of sysfs's functionality. Where sysfs is a filesystem-based
> -	  view of kernel objects, configfs is a filesystem-based manager
> -	  of kernel objects, or config_items.
> +	configfs is a ram-based filesystem that provides the converse

	              RAM-based

> +	of sysfs's functionality. Where sysfs is a filesystem-based
> +	view of kernel objects, configfs is a filesystem-based manager
> +	of kernel objects, or config_items.
>  
> -	  Both sysfs and configfs can and should exist together on the
> -	  same system. One is not a replacement for the other.
> +	Both sysfs and configfs can and should exist together on the
> +	same system. One is not a replacement for the other.
> 
> 


-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
desserts:  http://www.xenotime.net/linux/recipes/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/