[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012281231070.8883@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:35:45 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
x86@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, yinghai@...nel.org,
brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, shaohui.zheng@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between
32 and 64bit
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> index a35cb9d..1af9c6e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static __init void bad_srat(void)
> printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: SRAT not used.\n");
> acpi_numa = -1;
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; i++)
> - apicid_to_node[i] = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> + set_apicid_to_node(i, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; i++) {
> nodes[i].start = nodes[i].end = 0;
> nodes_add[i].start = nodes_add[i].end = 0;
> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ acpi_numa_x2apic_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_x2apic_cpu_affinity *pa)
> }
>
> apic_id = pa->apic_id;
> - apicid_to_node[apic_id] = node;
> + set_apicid_to_node(apic_id, node);
> node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
> acpi_numa = 1;
> printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC 0x%04x -> Node %u\n",
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_cpu_affinity *pa)
> apic_id = (pa->apic_id << 8) | pa->local_sapic_eid;
> else
> apic_id = pa->apic_id;
> - apicid_to_node[apic_id] = node;
> + set_apicid_to_node(apic_id, node);
> node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
> acpi_numa = 1;
> printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC 0x%02x -> Node %u\n",
> @@ -512,13 +512,13 @@ void __init acpi_fake_nodes(const struct bootnode *fake_nodes, int num_nodes)
> * node, it must now point to the fake node ID.
> */
> for (j = 0; j < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; j++)
> - if (apicid_to_node[j] == nid &&
> + if (__apicid_to_node[j] == nid &&
> fake_apicid_to_node[j] == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> fake_apicid_to_node[j] = i;
> }
> for (i = 0; i < num_nodes; i++)
> __acpi_map_pxm_to_node(fake_node_to_pxm_map[i], i);
> - memcpy(apicid_to_node, fake_apicid_to_node, sizeof(apicid_to_node));
> + memcpy(__apicid_to_node, fake_apicid_to_node, sizeof(__apicid_to_node));
>
> nodes_clear(nodes_parsed);
> for (i = 0; i < num_nodes; i++)
This is going to conflict with a387e95a ("") in x86/numa, so you'll need
the following hunk for acpi_fake_nodes(). I'm not sure why this patchset
is being based on x86/apic-cleanup rather than x86/numa?
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ void __init acpi_fake_nodes(const struct bootnode *fake_nodes, int num_nodes
* node, it must now point to the fake node ID.
*/
for (j = 0; j < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; j++)
- if (apicid_to_node[j] == nid &&
+ if (__apicid_to_node[j] == nid &&
fake_apicid_to_node[j] == NUMA_NO_NODE)
fake_apicid_to_node[j] = i;
}
@@ -522,13 +522,13 @@ void __init acpi_fake_nodes(const struct bootnode *fake_nodes, int num_nod
* value.
*/
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; i++)
- if (apicid_to_node[i] != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
+ if (__apicid_to_node[i] != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
fake_apicid_to_node[i] == NUMA_NO_NODE)
fake_apicid_to_node[i] = 0;
for (i = 0; i < num_nodes; i++)
__acpi_map_pxm_to_node(fake_node_to_pxm_map[i], i);
- memcpy(apicid_to_node, fake_apicid_to_node, sizeof(apicid_to_node));
+ memcpy(__apicid_to_node, fake_apicid_to_node, sizeof(__apicid_to_node));
nodes_clear(nodes_parsed);
for (i = 0; i < num_nodes; i++)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists