[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1293526288.2457.4.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:51:28 +0800
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] perf: Check if HT is supported and enabled
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 16:44 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
>
> Avoid the percore allocations if HT is not supported or disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> index bc4afb1..354d1de 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> @@ -1053,9 +1053,38 @@ static __initconst const struct x86_pmu core_pmu = {
> .event_constraints = intel_core_event_constraints,
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Check if HT is capable and enabled
> + * TBD: move it to generic place, so it can be used by others
> + */
> +
> +static bool ht_enabled(int cpu)
> +{
> + int total_logical_processors, total_cores;
> + unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> +
> + cpuid(1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> +
> + /* Bit 28 in EDX indicates if it's HT capable */
> + if (!(edx & 0x10000000))
> + return false;
> +
> + total_logical_processors = (ebx >> 16) & 0xff;
> +
> + ecx = 0;
> + cpuid(4, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> + total_cores = ((eax >> 26) & 0x3f) + 1;
> +
> + /* Thread nums per core */
> + return (total_logical_processors / total_cores) > 1;
> +}
> +
This function can be simplified as below,
static bool ht_enabled()
{
if (!cpu_has(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_HT))
return false;
return smp_num_siblings > 1;
}
But this still can't detect if HT is on or off.
smp_num_siblings is always 2 even if HT is disabled in BIOS.
Any idea how to detect if HT is on or not?
Thanks,
Lin Ming
> static int intel_pmu_cpu_prepare(int cpu)
> {
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
> +
> + if (!ht_enabled(cpu))
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
>
> cpuc->per_core = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct intel_percore),
> GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
> @@ -1073,6 +1102,15 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
> int core_id = topology_core_id(cpu);
> int i;
>
> + init_debug_store_on_cpu(cpu);
> + /*
> + * Deal with CPUs that don't clear their LBRs on power-up.
> + */
> + intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
> +
> + if (!ht_enabled(cpu))
> + return;
> +
> for_each_online_cpu(i) {
> struct intel_percore *pc = per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, i).per_core;
>
> @@ -1085,12 +1123,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
>
> cpuc->per_core->core_id = core_id;
> cpuc->per_core->refcnt++;
> -
> - init_debug_store_on_cpu(cpu);
> - /*
> - * Deal with CPUs that don't clear their LBRs on power-up.
> - */
> - intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
> }
>
> static void intel_pmu_cpu_dying(int cpu)
> --
> 1.7.3
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists