[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201012281057.54647.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:57:54 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] apic: use GFP_ATOMIC in lapic_resume
On Tuesday, December 28, 2010, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:56 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:39 +0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> > > > > > ===================================================================
> > > > > > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> > > > > > +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> > > > > > @@ -1459,7 +1459,7 @@ void __init enable_IR_x2apic(void)
> > > > > > if (dmar_table_init_ret && !x2apic_supported())
> > > > > > return;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - ioapic_entries = alloc_ioapic_entries();
> > > > > > + ioapic_entries = alloc_ioapic_entries(GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > > > if (!ioapic_entries) {
> > > > > > pr_err("Allocate ioapic_entries failed\n");
> > > > > > goto out;
> > > > > > @@ -2084,7 +2084,7 @@ static int lapic_resume(struct sys_devic
> > > > > >
> > > > > > local_irq_save(flags);
> > > > > > if (intr_remapping_enabled) {
> > > > > > - ioapic_entries = alloc_ioapic_entries();
> > > > > > + ioapic_entries = alloc_ioapic_entries(GFP_ATOMIC);
> > > > > > if (!ioapic_entries) {
> > > > > > WARN(1, "Alloc ioapic_entries in lapic resume failed.");
> > > > > > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > > >
> > > > > You can't do the allocation before disabling irqs when
> > > > > intr_remapping_enabled is set?
> > > >
> > > > yes, we can. The first idea came into my mind is to register a pm
> > > > notifier callback to allocate/free the memory. But that one duplicates
> > > > the code of alloc_ioapic_entries, which doesn't look nice, neither.
> > > > Plus, is there any problem with this one?
> > > >
> > >
> > > We try to avoid GFP_ATOMIC whenever possible and this seems like a
> > > particularly trivial case. You can simply move the alloc_ioapic_entries()
> > > and NULL check before local_irq_save() and GFP_KERNEL will work fine.
> >
> > I'm afraid not.
> > lapic_resume is invoked in sysdev_resume, which is done with irq
> > disabled, please refer to the code in kernel/power/suspend.c.
> >
> > arch_suspend_disable_irqs();
> > BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
> >
> > error = sysdev_suspend(PMSG_SUSPEND);
> > if (!error) {
> > if (!suspend_test(TEST_CORE) &&
> > pm_check_wakeup_events()) {
> > error = suspend_ops->enter(state);
> > events_check_enabled = false;
> > }
> > sysdev_resume();
> > }
> >
> > arch_suspend_enable_irqs();
> > BUG_ON(irqs_disabled());
> >
> > To pre-allocate the memory, we need to build a notifier bloack and call
> > register_pm_notifier.
>
> what about this one?
Quite frankly, I very much prefer the simple patch doing an atomic allocation.
Using GFP_KERNEL in a sysdev callback is a plain bug and should be fixed,
preferably in the simplest possible way (ie. replace GFP_KERNEL with
GFP_ATOMIC).
The question whether or not we can avoid allocating memory in there is a
different one and I'm not sure if the solution below is the most
straightforward one.
Thanks,
Rafael
> Note that it just builds okay, I have not test the patch yet.
>
> pre-allocate the memory used in lapic_resume because lapic_resume, as a
> sysdev .resume callback, is always invoked with irq disabled.
>
> Without this patch, I got the following warning messages after resume.
> [ 109.780371] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> mm/slub.c:793
> [ 109.780782] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 1391, name: bash
> [ 109.781024] Pid: 1391, comm: bash Not tainted 2.6.37-rc5+ #182
> [ 109.781264] Call Trace:
> [ 109.781501] [<ffffffff8104156a>] __might_sleep+0xeb/0xf0
> [ 109.781743] [<ffffffff8110d5e2>] slab_pre_alloc_hook.clone.33
> +0x28/0x31
> [ 109.781987] [<ffffffff8110dcef>] __kmalloc+0x88/0x115
> [ 109.782224] [<ffffffff81025e4a>] ? kzalloc.clone.19+0x13/0x15
> [ 109.782465] [<ffffffff81025e4a>] kzalloc.clone.19+0x13/0x15
> [ 109.782704] [<ffffffff81025ff0>] alloc_ioapic_entries+0x20/0x82
> [ 109.782948] [<ffffffff81024201>] lapic_resume+0x3a/0x245
> [ 109.783189] [<ffffffff813a8329>] ? cpufreq_resume+0x30/0xb0
> [ 109.783431] [<ffffffff812ec4ee>] __sysdev_resume+0x25/0xc5
> [ 109.783673] [<ffffffff812ec644>] sysdev_resume+0xb6/0xfb
> [ 109.783914] [<ffffffff81083256>] suspend_devices_and_enter
> +0x13c/0x1c1
> [ 109.784159] [<ffffffff810833b8>] enter_state+0xdd/0x12e
> [ 109.784398] [<ffffffff81082a61>] state_store+0xae/0xcb
> [ 109.784640] [<ffffffff81225737>] kobj_attr_store+0x17/0x19
> [ 109.784882] [<ffffffff81173311>] sysfs_write_file+0x114/0x150
> [ 109.785124] [<ffffffff8111aebb>] vfs_write+0xac/0xff
> [ 109.785365] [<ffffffff8111b0c2>] sys_write+0x4a/0x6e
> [ 109.785604] [<ffffffff8100ac82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #include <linux/nmi.h>
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/suspend.h>
>
> #include <asm/perf_event.h>
> #include <asm/x86_init.h>
> @@ -2033,6 +2034,34 @@ static struct {
> unsigned int apic_thmr;
> } apic_pm_state;
>
> +static struct IO_APIC_route_entry **ioapic_entries;
> +
> +static int lapic_notifier_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned long val, void *unused)
> +{
> + switch(val) {
> + case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
> + case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
> + case PM_RESTORE_PREPARE:
> + ioapic_entries = alloc_ioapic_entries();
> + if (!ioapic_entries)
> + return NOTIFY_BAD;
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> + case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
> + case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
> + case PM_POST_RESTORE:
> + free_ioapic_entries(ioapic_entries);
> + ioapic_entries = NULL;
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> + }
> + return NOTIFY_BAD;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block lapic_pm_nb = {
> + .notifier_call = lapic_notifier_cb,
> + .priority = 0,
> +};
> +
> static int lapic_suspend(struct sys_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> @@ -2077,14 +2106,12 @@ static int lapic_resume(struct sys_devic
> unsigned long flags;
> int maxlvt;
> int ret = 0;
> - struct IO_APIC_route_entry **ioapic_entries = NULL;
>
> if (!apic_pm_state.active)
> return 0;
>
> local_irq_save(flags);
> if (intr_remapping_enabled) {
> - ioapic_entries = alloc_ioapic_entries();
> if (!ioapic_entries) {
> WARN(1, "Alloc ioapic_entries in lapic resume failed.");
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -2094,7 +2121,6 @@ static int lapic_resume(struct sys_devic
> ret = save_IO_APIC_setup(ioapic_entries);
> if (ret) {
> WARN(1, "Saving IO-APIC state failed: %d\n", ret);
> - free_ioapic_entries(ioapic_entries);
> goto restore;
> }
>
> @@ -2145,7 +2171,6 @@ static int lapic_resume(struct sys_devic
> reenable_intr_remapping(x2apic_mode);
> legacy_pic->restore_mask();
> restore_IO_APIC_setup(ioapic_entries);
> - free_ioapic_entries(ioapic_entries);
> }
> restore:
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> @@ -2183,8 +2208,11 @@ static int __init init_lapic_sysfs(void)
> /* XXX: remove suspend/resume procs if !apic_pm_state.active? */
>
> error = sysdev_class_register(&lapic_sysclass);
> - if (!error)
> + if (!error) {
> error = sysdev_register(&device_lapic);
> + if (!error)
> + error = register_pm_notifier(&lapic_pm_nb);
> + }
> return error;
> }
>
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists